Trinicenter.com
Trinidad and Tobago News
Trinidad and Tobago Flag
 
T&T Resources
Links
 
Homepage


Headlines

The costly fight against flooding
Sunday, November 17, 2024
Credit card usage not a major concern
Saturday, November 16, 2024
NIF pays out $94.2m in bonds
Friday, November 15, 2024
Property tax payments nearing threshold
Thursday, November 14, 2024
Call for return of managed flotation
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
BRACING IN SOUTH
Tuesday, November 12, 2024
Imbert: No devaluation
Monday, November 11, 2024

International Opinions

World News

COLUMNISTS  
Ras Tyehimba  
Susan Edwards  
Dr. K Nantambu  
Winford James  
Dr. S Cudjoe  
Raffique Shah  
Terry Joseph  
Bukka Rennie  
Denis Solomon  
Stephen Kangal  
Corey Gilkes  
A.S. Leslie  
Shelagh Simmons  
Guest Writers  
blank

RESOURCES
¤ CARICOM Secretariat
¤ Caricom Single Market and Economy
¤ Caribbean Disaster Emergency Response Agency
¤ Government Ministries
¤ Trinidad & Tobago RESOURCES

¤ T and T Features
¤ World Opinions
¤ Zimbabwe Watch
¤ Venezuela Watch
¤ War & Terror
¤ Haiti's Coup 2004
¤ 'Caribs/Arawaks'
¤ History Analysis
¤ Online Forums
¤ Cable Listing
  ¤ BOOKS
  ¤ INT. SOURCES



Petrocaribe, a positive step for the region
Posted: Saturday, June 30, 2005

TrinidadAndTobagoNews.com
Staff Article

"Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Patrick Manning said his country also was willing, in principle, to share its oil but would like to analyse Chavez's proposal in greater detail because it could put his country at a competitive disadvantage."

The truth is we cannot depend on our Prime Minister Patrick Manning to take a right decision on anything. As a matter of fact, we can't depend on any of the present crop of politicians to see the big picture and make the decisions that will truly benefit the region.

Of course 'review the proposal' means consult the US. Our so-called terrorism bill was about the same thing; doing the bidding of the US at all costs. We have seen the history of that.

Of course the US backed analysts etc will make comments like this one:

"the agreements unveiled yesterday 'should not be seen from the standpoint of economic rationality, but rather from the broader perspective of Venezuela's aggressive foreign policy and attempts to increase its influence in the region'."

If this is so then so what?

It is not simply about Venezuela increasing its influence in the region. As far as I am concerned the region could do with a bit more of Chavez-type thinking as an influence. It is a matter of whether increased Venezuelan influence can benefit us as a whole region.

The US pushes its influence and muscles its way into the economies of so called 'third world' countries all the time and their influence benefits no one but themselves and their few selected cronies. Their arguments are just hypocrisy and fear on their parts that Bolivarian revolutionary thinking will empower a region that has long been the US's playground.

It is up to us as a people to put pressure on our governments to do the right thing.

We can't continue thinking like if we are subsidiary citizens of the United States of America. We should not continue to support ventures that only bring economic benefits to American corporations and the elite in our societies, ventures that were never in our best interest anyway.

Hats off to Chavez for putting forward this plan that can benefit the entire Caribbean region.

If he and his policies, that are more in line with bringing relief to the disadvantaged, can further influence the region, then that is a good thing.

We will see if Patrick Manning and Owen Arthur will continue being the US' puppy dogs!





Map and Statistics
Aerial View of Port of Spain
Photo Album

Trinidad and Tobago Carnival

TriniView.com

Trinidad and Tobago Outings and Features

TrinbagoPan.com

Nubian School

Rootsie.com

RootsWomen.com

Ayanna

howcomyoucom.com

Race and History.com

Dialogue

Africa Speaks

USCrusade.com

Back to top